Short answer:
No.
Long answer:
SA has the meaning “Share Alike” which means you need to publish your derived title under the same license as the song/image that you use. While it seems obvious at first that a full game/website/whatever isn’t derived from a single song/image, legally it is. So what does that mean? It means that you have to license your whole project under CC-BY-SA if you use a single CC-BY-SA song/image in it. Thus everybody can copy your project freely, sell it, send it out for free, or whatever he decides to do with it – as long as he/she refers to you as the author and quotes the license.
Hint:
It’s a good idea to contact the author of the song/image and ask for a different license if you like the song/image a lot. The creator has the freedom to allow you to publish his work under a different license. And from my experience there’s a good chance they will do so.
August 12th, 2011
Most of this is wrong.
* SA is “share alike”, not “same attribution”.
* There is no reason that the BY-SA would spread to the whole project; it only applies to the material that was licensed under BY-SA.
August 15th, 2011
You were right about “same attribution” actually being “share alike”. I made a mistake when translating the german version of the article, sorry for that.
As for your claim that the BY-SA doesn’t spread to the whole project I suggest you read the license again. It clearly states
There’s quite some disussions about what derivate works exactly are, that’s why I checked back with my lawyer who told me that everything using anything CC-BY-SA licensed can be called a derivate work thus the license spreads out to the whole project.
Also CC FAQ states the following:
That leaves me with the question why you think that only the work that’s originally licensed with CC-BY-SA is affected by the license when the official CC FAQ states that this is not true for combined works.
September 13th, 2011
The full legal code makes a clear distinction between adaptions and collections (“Abwandlung” and “Sammelwerk” in german), Probably this is the answer your’re looking for:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/legalcode
September 14th, 2011
Yes, I have read the legal code. It’s one of the reasons why I think that you can’t use BY-SA licensed music in your project without the whole project falling below the license. Especially the part where it says “the synchronization of the Work in timed-relation with a moving image (“synching”) will be considered an Adaptation” caused me to believe this. In that case material from a different medium (video) under your own license mixed with BY-SA licensed material (audio) has to be published with the BY SA license. One might argue that if you write for example a game that the game is not synced as written in the legal code but is it really not? Most games start different audio tracks depending on the situation, on game states and the likes. It might not be synced frame wise like it happens with videos but it’s synced to some extent and the legal code nor the license provide any details on this question.